Illustrating the Income Divide

dollar2

Knowing that the dollar has been strengthening against many of the world’s currencies, I was googling to see what places would be cheap to visit.  I often pause to see the google suggestions as they are often interesting, and this was no exception.

We hear a lot on the news about how there is a widening income divide, but this kind of brought it home.  Though the first result was “strongest”, the next 6 results are about dollar stores and discount movie theaters.

Advertisements

Why is Yale so reluctant to remove Calhoun’s name?

Is it because of an abiding fondness for Calhoun?  No that couldn’t be it.  Yale is a bastion of liberalism and would be happy to denounce him.  Is it out of respect for history?  I don’t think that’s it either…

Yale doesn’t want to open the book on revisionist naming, because it draws attention to the fact that the College is named after Elihu Yale, who participated in the slave trade.

Here he is below.  Do you notice anything unusual about the picture?  Do you see the person on the left with a letter that the original listing calls a “servant”?ag-obj-663-001-pub-large

That is a slave wearing a metal collar.

Here is another, with him seated in the middle.  Note the “page” in the background.ag-obj-52745-001-pub-large

She is wearing something too.
Capture

Pretty disgusting, isn’t it?  You see Yale was involved in the slave trade.  He wasn’t sailing the ships back and forth, but he oversaw it as an overseer  for the East India Company.  He was certainly complicit in the slave trade however, and certainly choose to have slaves portrayed in his own portraits as a symbol of his status.  source

So you can see why they don’t want to open this door in the first place, because taking down Calhoun’s name leads directly to the questioning of the name of Yale itself.

 

As a person from the South, I have grappled with the issue of a shadowed heritage all of my life.  As a young man examining my family history, I saw how many of my ancestors died fighting for the Confederacy, and to tell you the truth I felt mixed emotions.  Pride that they were noble and fought in war when called, but embarrassed that they’d done it for the Confederacy.  The war was in fact over the right of people’s ability to own slaves, and these guys fought in it.  That makes them complicit, right?

A more sober view has developed over time.  As a more mature adult, I took a much more thorough eye to my ancestry.  Reading their wills, and lists of property, I have come to find that to my knowledge only one of my ancestors owned slaves, and he in fact was rather notoriously murdered by a slave named Jerry for taking liberties with Jerry’s wife.  Not our proudest moment in early family history by any stretch of the imagination. source

That being said, after that guy, nada.  All those latter ancestors, the ones that died in the war of the States, they didn’t own any slaves.  They were poor farmers that had to fight.  Rich guys could pay someone else to go for them, but they had no choice in the matter.  Whether they agreed with succession or not, they were at war with the North and that was their reality.

So why should I, a guy who has only one known ancestor to own slaves, who was in fact killed by a slave, feel bad about historical slavery or lingering racism?  The answer is that I shouldn’t.  I had nothing to do with it.  I should have my eyes open to that context, and I should be aware of the ramifications of slavery that still echo today, but I shouldn’t be caring around guilt or feeling ashamed.  I’ve made peace with my ancestry, both the good parts and the darker ones, and it frees me up to truly experience the present.

In the same way, Yale shouldn’t be renaming it’s buildings.  The reality is, these people formed the institution as it stands today, and no matter how uncomfortable we may be with parts of the past, this reality has to be faced.  Because while what we are is simply the sum of our history and out of our control, it is who we are that defines us, and that we do control.

 

 

The water towers of NYC

So I was in meetings all day in a skyscraper near Times Square, and while admiring the view, I noticed the plethora of water towers that dot the skyline.

Capture
(See all those cylinders on the rooftops?)

It turns out, that the reason they are on top of all these buildings is because the water pressure doesn’t reach above 6 stories on it’s own.  So they have pumps pump the water to the tower(s) on the roof, and it is distributed throughout the building from there.

They are mostly made of wood, and apparently there are only 2 companies that make them.  That’s a good business to be in!

source

New Yorkers aren’t that Bad

Before I moved here I thought that anyone who was from here would epitomize all the caricatures we see on TV and film about New Yorkers.  Turns out, those characters are the exception, not the norm.  I have found the following about native NYC persons:

Manhattanites:
These folks are rare, and come in two forms.  One is the lucky rent control type, where they grew up in their grandparents rent controlled apartment, and pay like $600 a month.  The rent controlled ones are in my experience really nice people!  They don’t have a strong accent either.  The other kind are the privileged sort you would generally expect to have been born and raised in Manhattan.  These can range from blue bloods, that really do seem like they live on a higher plane and kind of won’t talk to you, to people who are so friendly and generous and make you love NYC.  I went to bible study last night in what I suspect was a couple on the good end of that latter category.  Beautiful place in Tribecca that the open up for college kids to have Bible study in.  They sometimes seem to have an accent that is distinct, but not one I really would have been able to place in New York had I heard it.

Long Islanders:
These folks can be down right … rural almost.  The ones that are really from here have kept moving further and further out it seems like, and they are used to a suburban semi rural kind of life.  Some of them have more in common with someone who lives in a suburb of Atlanta than a Manhattanite.  A lot of blue collar types, but a mix of everyone else too.

Brooklynites:
They keep getting pushed further and further out by gentrification at this point (meaning further from Manhattan).  Most of the natives I’ve met are African American, Italian, or Latino, and generally not very happy about Brooklyn being taken over by the new crowd, unless they bought property.  Still friendly and kind people.  They have a strong accent, probably the strongest I’ve heard.

Bronx:
There seem to be a TON of people born and raised here, but I think some of it is that there are so many projects here.  If you’ve ever wondered why Brooklyn is gentrifying and the Bronx isn’t, that’s why.

Queens:
Tons of people born and raised here, and they are all over the map.  Queens is huge and diverse.